OXID FORGE · THE AGENT

Where the mind becomes an agent.

Forge binds Oxid-DB, Sensory and Surface into one agent: it remembers, perceives, speaks, and reasons over verified knowledge instead of guessing.

$ oxid forge run "summarise our crisp pale lagers" --grounded
THE BINDING

Three systems, forged into one agent.

Forge binds memory, perception, and voice into a single agent: one that doesn't just retrieve and respond, but reasons over what it knows.

SOURCE SYSTEMS
Oxid-DB
Sensory
Surface
FORGED AGENT
molten core · real reasoning
Sensory perceives.Oxid reasons.Surface speaks.Forge acts.
REAL REASONING

It reasons. It doesn't guess.

Forge doesn't autocomplete an answer. It runs a genuine reasoning loop: every step grounded in Oxid's neurosymbolic graph of logic and vectors, so its conclusions are checkable, not invented.

PerceiveReads the query and live signals
RecallPulls grounded facts from the graph
ReasonChains logic across facts and vectors
ActTakes a step or calls a tool
ObserveChecks the result, updates memory
VERIFIED MEMORY · the loop is grounded here
PLAIN LLM

A plain LLM autocompletes from its training.

FORGE

Forge reasons over the live knowledge graph, and shows its work.

ONE AGENT, THREE FACULTIES

Forge conducts the whole Oxid stack:memory, perception, and expression as one mind.

Oxid-DB remembers, Sensory perceives, Surface speaks. Forge is the agent that binds all three: routing every request to the right faculty and weaving the answers back into one coherent loop.

Oxid ForgeTHE ORCHESTRATOR · ROUTES EVERY REQUEST
INSIDE A FORGED AGENT

Every answer traces back to a fact.

Watch a forged agent reason over the knowledge graph: querying, recalling cited facts, and grounding its answer. No black box. Every claim is sourced.

forge://agent: reasoning traceGROUNDED
USER GOAL

Can a Forge agent write to Oxid-DB inside a read transaction?

THOUGHT

To answer this I can't guess: I need two facts from the graph: the isolation level of a read transaction, and whether an agent holds the write capability inside one. Let me query both.

OxQL

FIND?iso?cap

WHEREReadTxnHAS-ISOLATION?iso

ANDAgentHOLDS?capINReadTxn

RECALL
ReadTxn → isolation: snapshotstorage.isolation
Agent → write capability: not granted in read txncaps.txn
TOOL

write("Brewery", { name: ... })

✗ rejected · capability missing under snapshot isolation

GROUNDED ANSWER

No. Inside a read transaction the agent runs at snapshot isolation, and the write capability is not granted, so the write is rejected before it ever reaches the store.

No retrieval theater. Every step is a real OxQL query, every recalled fact carries its source, and the answer is a function of those cited facts: remove a citation and the answer changes.

Grounded by construction: trace it back to the graph, or it doesn't ship.
BUILT FOR AGENTS

Everything an agent needs to reason in one runtime.

Grounded reasoning

Answers cite graph facts: no hallucinated sources.

ReAct loop

Think → act → observe, until the goal is met.

Native tool use

OxQL queries and MCP tools, called directly.

Full provenance

Every claim traceable back to its source.

Bring your own model

Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, or local Ollama.

One binary

Runs standalone: no extra services to deploy.

Research preview · v0.8.5
OXID FORGE

Forge an agent that actually reasons.

Grounded in your graph, retrieving data you control, traceable to the source, and running on the model you choose.

Research preview · v0.8.5: open and evolving.